AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT and XTX: The Latest Addition To AMD's 2019 Graphics Cards

The

AMD has confirmed that it will launch its new RX series graphics cards in the first quarter of 2019. The company is expected to introduce three versions of the AMD Radeon RX 7900 AT and AMD Radeon RX 7900 ATX, which will target the different price points on the market. It's probably safe to assume that these new cards are either a refresh or a more powerful version of the current-generation Polaris GPU, so performance should be similar.

After Nvidia has actually currently presented graphics cards in terms of graphics cards and released the new Ada Lovelace generation in the form of the GeForce RTX 4080 and RTX 4090, there are now brand-new graphics cards from AMD. Because Tuesday, December 13th, the two brand-new rows Radon RX 7900 AT and Radon RX 7900 XTX have actually been available. The Group Red wishes to attack the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 with the new 3D accelerators. The flagship RTX 4090 seems too far away since Nvidia has made a huge efficiency boost. However, the price-performance ratio of the GeForce RTX 4090 is evil and good, so that just professional users or genuine fans must gain access to. The GeForce RTX 4080 is also far too pricey for its performance compared to models such as the AMD Radeon RX 6900 AT, although in relation it is not quite as bad with the price-performance ratio as the RTX 4090. This is precisely where AMD wishes to start and have 2 similar graphics cards for a considerably much better price in the portfolio compared to Nvidia. We analyzed whether this succeeds for our special. We have actually statistically summed up numerous tests currently released by expert editors in order to acquire excellent average worth. Obviously, we also look at the question of how it looks with the price-performance ratio of the Radon RX 7900 AT and RX 7900 ATX, and the electricity requirement is likewise an issue. However initially we take a look at the technical data of the 2 new AMD graphics cards.

Radon RX 7900 AT and 7900 ATX: The innovation

The AMD's name is sadly a bit unfortunate, because as a purchaser you may easily neglect the fact that there is a Radon RX 7900 AT and XTX.

There are important distinctions on the technical side: The XTX variation has 96 compute systems and 6144 FPS32-alus (formerly also referred to as shader units), the clocks are 2300 MHz at the fundamental clock and the boost 2500 MHz. The AT version, on the other hand, has a great 14 percent less Compute Units and FP32-Alus, the base is only 2000 MHz for the clock, which is 300 MHz or 15 percent less than the XTX. In the boost, the range at 2400 MHz is just 100 MHz. There are likewise distinctions in the GDR6-RAM: 24 GB with a data rate of 960 GB/s there is the RX 7900 ATX. With the RX 7900 AT it is 20 GB with just 880 GB/s data throughput, which is not a little. Nvidia's GeForce RTX 4080 offers 16 GB with 717 GB/s, however GDDR6X-RAM. Here are the data of the 4 new AMD and NVIDIA graphics cards and the Radon RX 6900 AT as a comparison: Of course, you can not read anything about the technical data alone, however the RX 7900 AT and RX 7900 XTX both use the new GPU NAVY 31 with the new RDNA3 architecture, a distinction of around 15 percent can be assumed utilizing a comparison. We see whether this applies in our analysis. However, we want to enter into the brand-new architecture RDNA3 at this moment. Since a special feature is the chaplet building, in which the GPU no longer consists of a single block, however is divided into modules: there is a GCD (Graphics Computer System Die) and the MCDS (Memory Cache Dies). One benefit is the costs, among other things, given that you can combine this as needed, and on the other hand, as you do not need to copy the entire GPU directly in the occasion of an error in one of the components. But there is likewise a disadvantage that AMD likewise honestly appeals: Interaction with the RAM is not as great as with a monolithic construction, which AMD wishes to compensate for with a high clock, but it is still not above that of Nvidia's 4000 designs. In the end, of course, it is essential for buyers what the graphics card does and what it costs in the shop. We follow to the efficiency. Page 1 RX 7900 AT and XTX: Intro and technology Page 2 RX 7900 AT and XTX: Performance analysis Page 3 RX 7900 AT and XTX: Ray tracing and electricity requirements Page 4 RX 7900 AT and XTX: Rate efficiency and conclusion Page 5 photo gallery for AMD Radeon RX 7900 AT and XTX: rate, efficiency and technology performance Next page Next page To the gallery to the homepage Share comments 0 in Twitter Share Short Article

Comments

Popular Posts